Global Gold Rush Fuels Illegal Trade and
Mining, Governments Rush to Buy from All Sources
1.
25-Year Gold Boom:
A prolonged surge in gold demand driven by fears of instability in assets like
stocks, bonds, and currencies.
2.
Safe-Haven Motivation:
Investors and institutions buy gold as protection against war, terrorism, and economic uncertainty.
3.
Paradoxical Outcome:
The gold rush is indirectly
fueling violence and instability it
is meant to hedge against.
4.
Conflict Financing:
Gold revenues are linked to:
o Civil war in Sudan
o Russia’s war in Ukraine
o Sanction resilience of
Iran and Venezuela
5.
Rise of Illegal Mining:
o Deforestation and
mercury pollution in the Amazon rainforest
o Severe environmental
and health damage
6.
Criminal Involvement:
Terror groups and cartels increasingly entering the gold trade.
7.
Case Study – Colombia:
o The Clan del Golfo
controls illegal gold mining operations
o Uses profits to fund violence, bombings, and territorial
control
8.
Supply Chain Contamination:
Gold from illegal or unethical sources enters global supply chains, often undetected.
9.
Institutional Complicity:
o United States Mint and
Royal Canadian Mint implicated in sourcing questionable gold indirectly
o Use technical loopholes
to classify foreign gold as domestic
10. Weak Enforcement:
Despite policies and legal requirements, traceability
systems fail to fully prevent illicit sourcing.
11. Economic Structure
Issue:
o Gold industry operates
on low margins
o Incentive is to increase volume, not scrutiny
12. Complex Supply Chain:
Multiple intermediaries (miners, exporters, transporters, refiners) dilute
accountability.
13. Profit Distribution:
Small earnings spread across the chain push actors to accept even suspect gold supplies.
14. Vicious Cycle:
Fear-driven gold buying → higher prices → more illegal mining
→ more funding for conflict → more instability.
15. Big Picture:
Gold’s role as a safe
haven asset is undermined by its growing link to global insecurity, crime, and
environmental harm.
[ABS News Service/29.04.2026]
At
this point, we’re 25 years into a gold frenzy.
It’s
fanned by media personalities like Tucker Carlson — who is now selling gold — and
by more staid institutions like central banks and big investment managers in wealthy
countries. They’re selling to customers who are all buying for essentially the same
reason. They’re afraid everything else — stocks, bonds, even dollars — might lose
value in the face of various forms of instability, like war or terror attacks.
But
this gold frenzy has had an ironic side effect: It’s led to a wave of
destructive mining that funds wars and terror attacks.
Gold
funds Sudan’s brutal civil war and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Surging gold prices
have helped Venezuela and Iran temper the effects of financial sanctions. Illegal
miners deforest and pollute the Amazon, poisoning people there with mercury. Terrorist
groups are getting into the gold business, too.
Put
succinctly, wealthy people and governments buy gold to seek refuge from violence
and instability — and in doing so, they fuel more violence and more instability.
That
might sound like an abstract connection, and sometimes it is. But sometimes, it
isn’t. As my colleagues and I found out in an investigation we published this
week, sometimes it takes the form of the U.S. Mint buying and selling gold that
comes from mines run by Colombian drug cartels.
Clan del Golfo gold
The
miners call the ranch La Mandinga, a name for an evil
spirit. When I visited with colleagues, we saw hundreds of miners extracting gold
by tearing up the land with high-pressure hoses and excavators, and using mercury
to separate the gold from sand.
For
the past eight years, Colombia’s biggest cartel, the Clan del Golfo, has run La
Mandinga. Nobody mines without cartel permission, and
everybody pays. (The cartel called it a “tax” in a statement they put out after
our story published.)
The
ranch’s open-air mines are both illegal and environmentally destructive. The Clan
del Golfo also uses the proceeds to maintain control over its territory through
murders and bombings.
Institutions
like the U.S. Mint aren’t supposed to be contributing to this sort of thing. The
massive gold sellers that supply wealthy governments and investors have detailed
policies to keep criminal gold out of their supply chain, and full-time staff to
enforce those policies. The U.S. Mint is even required by law to make its investor-grade
coins from only U.S.-mined gold.
But
for decades, it has instead looked the other way as gold from foreign sources, some
unethical or illegal, has entered its plant in West Point, N.Y., to be melted down
and made into coins.
The
Mint makes coins with a Lady Liberty design out of gold from Mexican and Peruvian
pawn shops and from a Congolese mine that is owned partly by the Chinese government,
records and interviews show. Some Mint gold has come from a company in Honduras
that dug up an Indigenous graveyard for the ore underneath.
The
Mint can do that thanks to some technical sleight-of-hand involving a long chain
of suppliers, and an effort to redefine the meaning of “U.S. gold” to include foreign
gold, as long as the foreign gold’s supplier also buys American gold.
But
maybe as important as how the Mint does this is why the Mint and its suppliers do
this. The price on gold is so high now that even the most prestigious institutional
buyers don’t have an incentive to look too closely at where it’s coming from.
A low-margin business
It’s
not just the U.S. Mint that engages in these practices. We also found in our investigation
that the Royal Canadian Mint, which claims to use cutting-edge technologies to trace
the origins of its gold, does the same thing. Canada is buying cartel gold too.
The
prevalence of the practice speaks to how hard it is to stop.
Gold
is a commodity, and that makes the gold industry a low-margin business. The big
refiners that supply both the U.S. and Canadian mints can’t really demand more than
the prevailing world price.
At
the other end of the supply chain, the shirtless miners who toil in the dirt for
a few grams of gold a day receive about 90 percent of that world price. Between
the miner and refiner are a small middleman, an exporter in Colombia, security and
transportation companies, and a middleman in Texas.
Each
link gets a small slice of the profits; there’s not much left by the time the big
refiner gets the gold. And since they can’t raise the price, the only way to make
more money is for everyone on this chain, from miner to middleman to refiner, to
process more.
In
this kind of system, few are willing to turn away even suspect supplies. And so the vicious cycle feeding all this — the anxiety that leads
to gold buying, which raises the price of gold, which fuels illegal mining, which
funds terrorists, drugs and dictators — churns on.