Atrazine Technical from China
under Anti-Subsidy Investigation on Complaint of Meghmani Inds.
[Initiation
Notification F.
No.06/19/2018- DGAD
dated 27th August 2018]
Subject: Initiation
of Countervailing Duty/ Anti-subsidy investigation concerning imports of Atrazine Technical
originating in or exported from China PR.
Whereas M/s Meghmani Industries Limited (hereinafter
referred to as the applicant or petitioner) has filed an application before the Designated Authority (hereinafter referred to as the “Authority”), on behalf of the domestic industry, in accordance with the Customs
Tariff Act 1975, as amended from time
to time (hereinafter referred to as the
Act) and Customs
Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Countervailing Duty on Subsidized Articles and
for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, as amended from
time to time, (hereinafter referred
to as the Rules), alleging subsidization of Atrazine Technical (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods), originating in or exported from People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the
subject country) and requesting for initiation of an anti-subsidy investigation for levy of
countervailing duties on the imports of the subject goods, originating in or exported from the
subject country.
A. Allegation of Subsidization
1. The applicant has alleged that the producers/exporters of the subject goods in the subject country have benefited from the actionable subsidies provided by
various levels in the
Government of China (GOC), including the Governments of the different Provinces and
Municipalities in which the producers/exporters are located, and other ‘Public Bodies’. The
applicants have relied upon the
relevant Laws, Rules, Regulations and other
Notifications of
the relevant Government Agencies and Public Bodies as available in the public domain and
in the determinations of other
investigating Authorities who have conducted comprehensive investigation of such programs and concluded existence of countervailable subsidy programs.
B. Consultation
2. In terms of Article 13 of ASCM pre-initiation consultations were held with the representatives
of the Government of the People’s Republic of China on 11th July, 2018. The comments of
the Govt. of People’s
Republic of China have been taken
on record.
C. Subsidy
Programs
3. The prima facie evidence provided by the applicant shows that the producers and exporters of
the subject goods in the subject country have benefited from a number of subsidies granted by
the Government and/or other public bodies of the subject countries
as listed below.
I. Programs
Identified
in
the form of Grants:
1. Program No.1: The
State Key Technology Renovation Projects
Fund
2. Program No.2: Famous Brands Program/ Incentive fund
for famous-brand products
3. Program No.3: Grants for Anti-dumping/Anti-subsidy Investigations
4. Program No.4: Research & Development (R&D) Assistance
Grant
5. Program No.5: Export Assistance Grant
6. Program No.6: Grants for Listing Shares
7. Program No.7:
Grants provided through the Provincial Fund for Fiscal and Technological
Innovation
8. Program No.8: International Market
Fund for Export Companies
9. Program No.9: Project funds
allowance
10. Program No.10: Special Fund
for
Energy Saving Technology Reform
11. Program No.11:
Funds for supporting technological innovation for the technological small and medium-sized enterprises/ Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Support Funds
12. Program No. 12: State Special Fund for Promoting Key Industries and Innovation Technologies
13. Program No.13: Enterprise Development Funds
14. Program No.14:
The Clean Production Technology Fund
15. Program No.15: Grants
for High and new technology
industries
16. Program No.16: Special fund for the development of foreign trade and economic Cooperation
17. Program No.18: Various
grants provided to Jiangsu province
a. Jiangsu Province Finance Supporting
Fund
b. Environment
Protection Award
(Jiangsu)
c. Jiangsu
City
Industrial Economy Performance Award
d. Changzhou Qishuyan
District Environmental Protection
Fund e. Changzhou Technology
Plan
f.
Supportive Fund provided
by the Government
of Xuyi Country
g. Enterprise Technology Centers/
Support Funds for Construction of Project infrastructure
18. Program No.19: Various
grants provided to Guangdong province
a. Special fund for developing trade through science and technology of Guangdong Province
b. Guangdong - Hong Kong Technology Cooperation Funding
Program
c. Guangdong Supporting Fund
d. Special Fund for Significant Science and Technology by Guangdong Governments
e. Provincial Government of Guangdong Science and Technology
Bureau Project Fund
f.
Provincial Loan Discount Special Fund
for SMEs by Guangdong Governments
g. Special Supporting Fund for Key Projects
of “500 Strong Enterprises
in Contemporary Industries” by Guangdong
Governments
h.
Fund for Supporting Strategic Emerging Industries by Guangdong
Governments
i.
Special Fund for Export Credit Insurance by Guangdong
Governments
j.
Patent Award of Guangdong Province
k. Supporting Fund for the Development
from Guangzhou Local
Governments
19. Various grants
provided to Anuhi Province
a. Program No.21(a): Initial Public Offering (IPO) Grants
from the Hangzhoz Prefecture and the City of (Anhui
Province)
II. Programs
Identified
in
form of Tax Incentives and VAT
exemption:
20. Program No.22: Export
tax rebate/Tax Refund on
Exports
21. Program No.23: Tax Policies for the deduction of research and development (R&D)
expenses
22. Program No.24: Preferential Tax Policies
for the Research
and Development of FIEs
23. Program No.25: Tax Offsets
for Research and Development
by FIEs
24. Program No.25:
Income tax credit for the purchase of domestically Produced & manufactured production equipment
25. Program No.27: Preferential tax policies/ Income Tax Reductions for companies that are
recognized as high and new technology companies
26. Program No.28: Income tax
concessions for the enterprises engaged
in comprehensive resource utilization
(special raw materials')
27. Program No.29 : Tax credit concerning
the purchase of special equipment.
28. Program No.30: Income Tax credits for domestically owned Companies Purchasing Chinese made Equipment
29. Program No.34: Reduced Tax Rate for
Productive FIEs Scheduled to operate for a Period not
Less Than 10 Years
30. Program No.35: Preferential Tax Policies
for Foreign Invested Export Enterprises
31. Program No.36:
Preferential Tax Policies for FIEs which are Technology Intensive and Knowledge Intensive
32. Program No.37:
Preferential Tax Policies for FIEs and Foreign Enterprises Which Have
Establishments or Places in China and are
engaged in Production or Business Operations Purchasing Domestically Produced Equipment’s
33. Program No.38:
Income Tax Refund for Re-investment of FIE Profits by Foreign
Investors
34. Program No.39: Income Tax Reduction for Advanced
Technology
FIEs
35. Program No.40: Preferential Tax Policies for Enterprises with Foreign Investment
(FIEs) Established
in Special Economic Zones (excluding
Shanghai Pudong Area)
36. Program No.41: Preferential Tax
Policies for FIEs Established
in the Coastal Economic
Open Areas and in the Economic and Technological
Development
Zones
37. Program No.42: Local Income Tax Exemption
and/or Reduction in SEZs and Other Designated
Areas
38. .Program No.43: Corporate Income Tax Exemption and/or
Reduction in SEZs and Other
Designated Areas
39. Program No.44:
Tariff and Value-added Tax (VAT) Exemptions
on Imported Materials
and Equipment in SEZs and Other Designated Areas
40. Program No.45:
Preferential income tax policy for the enterprises in the Northeast region
41. Program No.46:
Tax concessions for Central and
Western
Regions.
III. Identified
Programs in the
Form of Preferential
Loans
& Lending
42. Program No.48: Preferential Loans
to SOE.
43. Program No.49: Discounted Loans for Export-Oriented Enterprises and Export Loan
Interest Subsidies.
IV. Identified
Programs in the
Form of Export Financing and Export Credit
44. Program No.50: Export Seller's Credit.
45. Program No.51: Export Buyer's Credit.
46. Program No.52: Other Export Financing from State-Owned Banks.
47. Program No.53 : Export Credit Insurance Subsidies.
48. Program No.54 : Export Credit Guarantees.
V. Identified Programs
in the Form of Equity
49. Program No.55:
Equity infusions.
50. Program No.56:
Unpaid dividends.
51. Program No.57: Dividend exemption
between qualified resident
enterprises.
VI. Identified
Programs in the
Form of Provision of Goods
and
Services
52. Program No.58:
Provision of Electricity for
Less
Than Adequate Remuneration.
53. Program No.60: Land Use Rights in Industrial and Other
Special Economic Zone.
54. Program No.61: Land Use rights for SOEs.
55. Program No.62: Land Use rights for FIEs.
4. Applicant has also alleged a number of subsidies, not identified above, received by one of the producers of the product, availment of which has been reported by the company in its annual
report.
5. It has been alleged that the above programs are subsidies since they involve a financial
contribution from the Government of China
or other regional or local governments, including public bodies and confer benefit to the recipient(s). They
are also alleged to be contingent upon
the use of domestic over imported goods and/or contingent upon export performance and/or limited to
certain enterprises or groups of enterprises and/or products and/or regions, and
therefore, specific and countervailable.
6. The Designated Authority reserves the right to investigate other subsidies, which may be found to exist and availed by the producers and exporters of the subject goods, during the
course of the investigation.
D. Allegation of Injury
and
Causal Link
7. The applicant has furnished information on various parameters relating to ‘injury’ to the domestic industry as prescribed under Rules. The evidence provided by the applicant prima facie shows that the ‘injury’ to the domestic industry
has
been caused by
subsidized imports from People’s Republic of China. Performance of the industry has deteriorated over the injury period,
as summarized
below:
a. Imports from subject country have increased significantly both in absolute terms, and in relation
to production and consumption in India.
b. Imports
are undercutting the prices of the domestic industry and there is price depression.
c. The production and sales of the domestic industry have increased, but the market share
of the domestic industry has
declined.
d. The performance of the petitioning domestic industry has witnessed deterioration in terms of profits,
cash profits and return on investments.
e. While the volume parameters of the petitioning domestic industry have shown growth,
the profitability parameters have shown a decline
Apart from claiming material injury, the petitioning domestic
industry has also claimed threat of material injury as a result of
the subsidized imports.
E. Initiation of the Investigation
8. The Authority finds that there is prima
facie evidence of existence of countervailable subsidies
on production or export of the subject goods in People’s Republic of China and such subsidized imports are causing injury to the domestic industry through their volume and price
effects.
9. In view of the above position, the Authority hereby initiates an investigation into the alleged subsidization and consequent injury
to the domestic industry in terms of the Rule 6 of the Rules
supra, to determine the existence, degree and effect of alleged subsidization and to
recommend the amount of countervailing duty which, if levied, would be adequate to remove the injury to the domestic industry.
F. Domestic Industry
10. The application has been filed by M/s Meghmani Industries Limited. The petition has been supported by M/s Insecticides (India) Limited. As per the evidence available on record, the production of
applicant accounts for
a major proportion of the domestic production. The applicant thus satisfies the requirements of Rule 2(b) and Rule 6(3) of the Rules and
constitutes the “domestic industry” within the meaning of Rule 2(b) of Rules supra.
G. Product
under consideration
11. The product under consideration is “Atrazine Technical”, classifiable under various tariff sub- headings No. 38089199, 38089390 and 38089990. The scientific
name for Atrazine
is 6- chloro-N-ethylN'-(1-methylethyl)-triazine-2,4-diamine. Atrazine
technical is a commonly
used herbicide. It is a systemic triazine herbicide registered for the control of pre and post-
emergence of broadleaf weeds and grassy
weeds. Pure atrazine is an odorless white powder,
which is not very volatile, reactive, or flammable. It is synthesized in chemical factory
made in the laboratory and does not occur naturally. It is used mostly on farms on crops such as sugarcane, corn,
pineapples, sorghum, and macadamia nuts and also to prevent weeds from growing on both highway and railroad rights-of-way. It can be sprayed on croplands before
crops start growing and
after
they
have emerged
from the soil
12. Atrazine Technical is designated as a
Restricted-Use Pesticide (RUP), and is not available to
the general public. RUP’s are, by law, only available for sale to certified applicators or persons under their direct supervision,
and only for the purpose covered by the applicator’s
certification. It is
known by various names such as
a. 6-Chloro-N-Ethyl-N’-(1-Methylethyl)-Triazine-2,4-Diamine;
b. 2-Chloro-4-Ethylamino-6-Isopropylamine-S-Triazine;
c. 2-Chloro-4-(Ethylamino)-6-(Isopropylamino)-S-Triazine;
d. 2-Chloro-4-(Ethylamino)-6-(Isopropylamino)-Triazine;
e. Chloro-4-(Propylamino)-6-Ethylamino-S-Triazine;
f. Chloro-4-(Propylamino)-6-Ethylamino-S-Triazine, etc
Scope includes
all
synonyms
of the product under consideration
H. Like Article
13. The applicant has claimed that the goods produced by
the
domestic industry are like articles
to the subject goods originating in or exported from subject country. It has been stated that
there is no significant difference in the subject goods produced by the applicant and those exported from subject country. The applicant claims that the two are technically and
commercially substitutable. For the purpose of present investigation, the subject goods
produced by the domestic industry are being treated as ‘like article’ of the subject goods
imported from subject country.
I. Country
involved
14. The country involved in the present investigation is People’s Republic of China (also referred
to as” Subject Country”).
J. Period of investigation
15. The Period of Investigation (POI) in the present investigation is January, 2017 to December,
2017 (12 Months). The Authority however has considered it appropriate to fix April, 2017 – March, 2018 as the investigation period for the purpose
of present investigations. The
injury
investigation period shall cover
the periods 2014-15,
2015-16, 2016-17 and the period of investigation.
K. Procedure & Submission of information
16. The exporters
in the subject country, Government of
the subject country, importers and users
in India known to be concerned with the subject goods and the domestic industry are being informed separately
to enable them to file all information relevant in the form and manner
prescribed. Any other party interested to participate in the present investigation may also write to:
The Designated Authority Directorate General of Trade Remedies Department of Commerce
Ministry
of Commerce & Industry
4th Floor, Jeevan Tara Building,
5 Parliament Street,
New
Delhi – 110001
17. As per Rule 7(5) of the Rules supra, the Designated Authority is also providing opportunity to the
industrial users of the product under consideration,
and to representative consumer organizations who
can
furnish information
which is relevant to the
investigation regarding subsidy, injury and causal link. Any
other
interested party
may
also make its submissions relevant to
the investigation
within the time limit
set
out below.
L. Time limit
18. Any information relating to the present investigation should be sent in writing so as to reach
the Authority at the address mentioned
above not later than 40 (forty) days from the date of
publication of this notification. The
Government of China, known exporters and importers, who
are being addressed separately, are however required to submit
the information within 40 (forty)
days from the date
of the letter addressed to them separately. If no information
is received within the prescribed time limit or the submitted information is incomplete, the Authority may record its findings on the basis of the facts available on record in accordance with the Rules.
M. Submission of Information on Non-Confidential
basis
19. In terms of Rule 8 of the Rules, the interested parties are
required to submit
non confidential version of any
confidential information
provided to the Authority. In case confidentiality is claimed on any part of the questionnaire’s
response/submissions, the same must be submitted
in two separate sets (a) marked as Confidential (with title, index, number of pages, etc.) and
(b) other set marked as Non-Confidential (with title, index,
number of pages, etc.). All the
information supplied must be clearly marked as
either “confidential” or “non- confidential” at
the
top of each
page.
20. Information supplied
without any mark as “Confidential” shall be treated as non- confidential
and
the Authority shall be at liberty
to allow the other interested parties to inspect any such non-confidential information. Two (2) copies each of
the confidential version and the
non- confidential
version must be submitted.
21. For information claimed as confidential; the supplier of the information is required to provide
a good cause statement along with the supplied
information as to why such information cannot
be disclosed and/or why summarization of such information
is not possible.
22. The non-confidential version is required to be a replica of the confidential version with the
confidential information
preferably indexed or blanked-out/summarized depending upon the information on which confidentiality is claimed.
The non- confidential summary must be in sufficient detail to permit a reasonable understanding
of the substance of the information furnished on confidential basis. However, in exceptional circumstances, party submitting the
confidential information
may indicate that such information
is not susceptible of summary; a
statement of reasons why
summarization is not possible, must be provided to the satisfaction of the
Authority.
23. The Authority may accept or reject the request for confidentiality on examination of the nature
of the information submitted. If the Authority is satisfied
that the request for confidentiality is
not warranted or
the supplier
of the information is either unwilling to make the information public or to authorize its disclosure in generalized or summary
form, it may
disregard such information.
24. Any submission made without a meaningful non-confidential version thereof or without
a good cause statement on the confidentiality claim may not be taken on record by the Authority. The Authority on being satisfied and accepting the need for confidentiality of the information
provided; shall not disclose it to any party without specific authorization of the party providing such
confidential information.
N. Non cooperation
25. In terms of Rule 7(8), in case where an interested party refuses access to or does not provide
necessary information within a reasonable period, or significantly impedes the investigation,
the Authority may record its findings on the basis of the facts available to it and make such
recommendations
to the Central Government as
deemed
fit.
O. Inspection of Public File
26. In terms of Rule 7(7), any interested party may inspect the public file containing non-
confidential version
of the evidence submitted
by
other interested parties.
P. Sampling
27. In case a large number
of exporting producers in the People’s Republic of China are involved
in this proceeding, in order to complete the investigation within the stipulated time limits, the Authority may limit the exporter(s)/ producer(s) to be
investigated to a reasonable number by
selecting a sample. The sampling shall be carried out, if required, in terms of Rule 17(3) of the Rules.