Inspection, Search, Seizure
and Arrest under Goods & Services Tax Act
In any tax
administration the provisions for Inspection, Search, Seizure and Arrest are
provided to protect the interest of genuine tax payers (as the Tax evaders, by
evading the tax, get an unfair advantage over the genuine tax payers) and as a
deterrent for tax evasion. These provisions are also required to safeguard
Government’s legitimate dues. Thus, these provisions acts as a deterrent and by
checking evasion provide a level playing field to genuine tax payers.
2. It may
be mentioned that the options of Inspection, Search, Seizure and Arrest are
exercised, only in exceptional circumstances and as a last resort, to protect
the Government Revenue. Therefore, to ensure that these provisions are used
properly, effectively and the rights of tax payers are also protected, it is
stipulated that Inspection, Search or Seizure can only be carried out when an
officer, of the rank of Joint Commissioner or above, has reason to
believe the existence of such exceptional circumstances. In such cases
the Joint Commissioner may authorise, in writing, any
other officer to cause inspection, search and seizure.
However,
in case of arrests the same can be carried out only where the person is accused
of offences specified for this purpose and the tax amount involved is more than
specified limit. Further, the arrests under GST Act can be made only under authorisation from the Commissioner.
3. The
circumstances which may warrant exercise of these options are as follows: –
(I)
Inspection
‘Inspection’
is a softer provision than search which enables officers to access any place of
business or of a person engaged in transporting goods or who is an owner or an
operator of a warehouse or godown. As discussed above
the inspection can be carried out by an officer of CGST/SGST only upon a
written authorization given by an officer of the rank of Joint Commissioner or
above a Joint Commissioner or an officer higher in rank can give such
authorization only if he has reasons to believe that the person concerned has
done one of the following actions:
(a)
Suppression of any transaction relating to supply of goods or services or stock
in hand;
(b)
Claimed excess input tax credit;
(c)
Contravention of any provisions of the Act or the Rules to evade tax;
(d)
Transporting or keeping goods which escaped payment of tax or manipulating
accounts or stocks which may cause evasion of tax;
Inspection
can also be done of the conveyance, carrying a consignment of value exceeding
specified limit. The person in charge of the conveyance has to produce
documents / devices for verification and allow inspection. Inspection during
transit can be done even without authorisation of
Joint Commissioner.
(ii)
Inspection in movement
(a) Any
consignment, value of which is exceeding Rs.
50,000/-, may be stopped at any place for verification of the documents
/devices prescribed for movement of such consignments.
(b) If on
verification of the consignment, during transit, it is found that the goods
were removed without prescribed document or the same are being supplied in
contravention of any provisions of the Act then the same can be detained or
seized and may be subjected to penalties as prescribed.
(c) To
ensure transparency and minimise hardships to the
trade the law provides that if during verification, in transit, a consignment
is held up beyond 30 minutes the transporter can feed details on the portal.
This will ensure accountability and transparency for all such verifications.
Moreover, for verification during movement of consignment will also be done
through Digital interface and therefore the physical intervention will be
minimum and as has already been mentioned that in case of a delay beyond 30
minutes the transporter can feed the details on the portal.
(iii) Search& Seizure
The
provisions of search and seizure also provides enough safeguards and the GST
Law stipulates that search of any place of business etc. can be carried out
only under authorisation from an officer of the rank
of Joint Commissioner and if he has a reason to believe that the person concerned
has done at least one of the following:-
(a) Goods
liable to confiscation or any documents /books/record/things, which may be
useful for or relevant to any proceedings, are secreted in any place then all
such places can be searched;
(b) All
such goods/documents/books/record/ things may be seized, however, if it is not
practicable to seize any such goods then the same may be detained. The person
from whom these are seized shall be entitled to take copies/ extracts of seized
records;
(c) The
seized documents/books/things shall be retained only till the time the same are
required for examination /enquiry/proceedings and if these are not relied on
for the case then the same shall be returned within 30 days from the issuance
of show cause notice;
(d) The seized
goods shall be provisionally released on execution of bond and
furnishing a security or on payment of applicable tax, interest and penalty;
(e) In
case of seizure of goods, a notice has to be issued within six months, if no
notice is issued within a period of six months then all such goods shall be
returned. However, this period of six months can be extended by Commissioner
for another six months on sufficient cause;
(f) An
inventory of the seized goods/documents/ records is required to be made by the officer
and the person, from whom the same are seized, shall be given a copy of the
same.
(g) To
ensure that the provisions for search and seizure are implemented in a proper
and transparent manner, the Act stipulates that the searches and seizures shall
be carried out in accordance with the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code,
1973. It ensures that any search or seizure should be made in the presence of
two or more independent witnesses, a record of entire proceedings is made
and forwarded to the Commissioner forthwith.
(iv)
Arrests
In the
administration of taxation the provisions for arrests are created to tackle the
situations created by some unscrupulous tax evaders. To some these may appear
very harsh but these are necessary for efficient tax administration and also
act as a deterrent and instil a sense of discipline. The provisions for arrests
under GST Law have sufficient inbuilt safeguards to ensure that these are used
only under authorisation from the Commissioner.
Besides this, the GST Law also stipulates that arrests can be made only in
those cases where the person is involved in offences specified for the purposes
of arrest and the tax amount involved in such offence is more than the
specified limit. The salient points of these provisions are:-
(a)
Provisions for arrests are used in exceptional circumstance and only with prior
authorisation from the Commissioner.
(b) The
law lays down a stringent criteria and procedure to be followed for arresting a
person. A person can be arrested only if the criteria stipulated under the law
for this purpose is satisfied i.e. if he has committed specified offences (not
any offence) and the tax amount is exceeding rupees 200 lakhs. However, the monetary
limit shall not be applicable if the offences are committed again even after
being convicted earlier i.e. repeat offender of the specified offence scan be
arrested irrespective of the tax amount involved in the case.
(c)
Further, even though a person can be arrested for specified offences involving
tax amount exceeding Rs.200 lakhs, however, where the tax involved is less than
Rs. 500 lakhs, the offences are classified as
non-cognizable and bailable and all such arrested
persons shall be released on Bail by Deputy/Assistant Commissioner. But in case
of arrests for specified offences where the tax amount involved is more than Rs. 500 lakhs, the offence is classified as cognizable and
non-bailable and in such cases the bail can be
considered by a Magistrate only.