Iran Offers 7-Day Plan to End War, Reopen Strait of Hormuz

Under the offer, the Strait of Hormuz would reopen and nuclear talks would be revived.

Proposal Details

· Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi announced a seven-day plan to end hostilities and restart nuclear talks.

· Conditions:

o Ceasefire across all fronts (including Lebanon).

o U.S. releases $12 billion in frozen assets.

o Sanctions on Iranian oil waived.

o Naval blockade lifted.

o Strait of Hormuz reopened on Day 7.

Diplomatic Context

· Plan mirrors a June memorandum of understanding that collapsed, but with a compressed timeline (7 days vs. 60 days).

· Iran hopes for agreement before U.S. midterm elections.

· U.S. officials call talks “positive and constructive” but cautious about rushing.

Global Reaction

· Bahrain, backed by 80 nations, condemned Iran’s attacks in the strait and demanded reopening without tolls.

· Trump threatened Iran with “annihilation” at the U.N., while Iran’s president Masoud Pezeshkian vowed defiance.

War Background

· U.S.–Iran war ongoing for 7 months, sparked by February airstrikes that killed Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

· War has disrupted oil, energy, and food prices globally.

Strategic Calculations

· Analysts say Iran’s plan tempts Trump:

o Ends an unpopular war.

o Lowers energy prices before midterms.

o Restores a deal favorable to Iran.

· Ali Vaez (International Crisis Group): “A compressed timeline to get to the nuclear issue should be appealing to an impatient president.”

[ABS News Service/25/09/2026]

Iran’s foreign minister said Thursday that Tehran had proposed to Washington a seven-day plan to cease hostilities, reopen the Strait of Hormuz and then begin comprehensive talks on his country’s nuclear program.

Abbas Araghchi, the foreign minister, told reporters at a press briefing at the United Nations General Assembly that the proposal closely mirrored the commitments laid out in a so-called memorandum of understanding that was struck between the United States and Iran in June but quickly unraveled.

He said Iran was ready to begin putting the plan into effect as soon as Washington agreed to it.

“We have introduced a plan to the United States through the intermediators that if certain conditions are met, the Strait of Hormuz would be open on the end of the seventh day and talks would restart,” Mr. Araghchi said.

He said “it would be better,” if a deal was reached before the U.S. midterm elections.

An American official familiar with the talks said that the administration was having positive and constructive discussions through mediators, but that the United States was not going to rush into a deal.

The Iranian proposal came even as President Trump and Iran’s president, Masoud Pezeshkian, delivered mutually hostile speeches at the United Nations. Mr. Trump threatened Iran with “annihilation” if it did not strike a deal, while a defiant Mr. Pezeshkian told world leaders his country would not be bullied.

Though Iran’s proposal contains many of the same conditions of the deal that fell apart, the behind-the-scenes diplomacy suggested that both sides may see much to gain from finding an off-ramp from the war.

Iranian officials said that while the proposal was effectively the same as the memorandum of understanding made in June, it was designed to move at a much faster pace. In the earlier agreement, a 60-day time frame was set for reaching nuclear negotiations.

Under the conditions that Iran has set for the agreement, according to Mr. Araghchi, during the seven days all hostilities would end, including in Lebanon; the U.S. would release Iran’s frozen assets — estimated at at least $12 billion — waive sanctions on Iranian oil and lift the naval blockade on Iran. Then, on the last day, the Strait of Hormuz would be opened.

In the afternoon, Bahrain led 80 nations in condemning Iran’s attacks in the strait and the Houthis for their actions in Yemen and attacks in Saudi Arabia and the Red Sea, and they called for the immediate reopening of the strait without tolls.

After the seven days, Mr. Aragchi said, comprehensive negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program would immediately begin. Mr. Trump has said that his top goal is for Iran not to have a nuclear weapon, and that he would either achieve that through a diplomatic deal or with more attacks.

The United States and Iran have been at war for nearly seven months. It began in late February when the United States and Israel launched airstrikes that killed Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and military chain of command. Mr. Trump initially said the war would take only a few weeks.

The war has had widespread global repercussions including on oil, energy and food prices.

The Iranian proposal came as U.S. negotiators have tried to jump start diplomacy with Iran on its nuclear program through talks on the sidelines of the United Nations assembly. The U.S. secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said a three-hour meeting, mediated by Qatar, between U.S. and Iranian officials did not end in a breakthrough.

Mr. Araghchi, who will be in New York until next Monday, met on Tuesday with the U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, a son-in-law of Mr. Trump’s. It was mediated by Qataris passing messages between the two sides, and Mr. Araghchi described it as “productive” and said the messaging continued.

Ismaeil Baghaei, the spokesman for Iran’s foreign ministry who is also in New York, said that it was possible that there would be more mediated meetings in the coming days.

Iran’s economy is under serious strain, and Iranians are suffering from skyrocketing inflation on basic food items, a shortage of medicine and disruptions to commerce.

Analysts said that Mr. Trump would have to weigh the benefits of reaching a deal with Iran before the midterms against keeping a chokehold on its economy in the hope of getting more concessions from Tehran.

“This is a smart move,” said Ali Vaez, the Iran director of the International Crisis Group. “They know it’s very tempting for President Trump because it ends an unpopular war and brings down energy prices in the run-up the midterms. But it also restores a deal that was largely favorable to the Iranians. A compressed timeline to get to the nuclear issue should be appealing to an impatient president.”