McKinsey to Pay $650 Million in Opioid Settlement with Justice Department
A former senior
partner will also plead guilty to obstruction of justice after destroying company
documents.
[ABS News Service/14.12.2024]
McKinsey &
Company has agreed to pay $650 million to settle a Justice Department investigation
of its work with the opioid maker Purdue Pharma. A former senior partner has also
agreed to plead guilty to obstruction of justice for destroying internal company
records in connection with that work.
At the center of the government’s case was the global consulting giant’s
recommendation that Purdue Pharma “turbocharge” sales of Purdue’s flagship OxyContin
painkiller in the midst of an opioid addiction epidemic that was killing hundreds
of thousands of Americans.
The settlement
and the government’s findings were presented at a news conference in Boston on Friday.
According to prosecutors, McKinsey “knew the risks and dangers associated with OxyContin,”
as well as the fact that top Purdue Pharma executives had pleaded guilty to federal
crimes relating to sales of the drug. Yet the consulting company chose to continue
working with the drugmaker to boost sales of the opioid.
More than two
dozen McKinsey partners consulted for Purdue over roughly 15 years, earning the
firm $93 million.
The settlement,
which the government said ended its investigation of McKinsey, stemmed from charges
brought by the U.S. attorney’s offices in Massachusetts and the Western District
of Virginia. The case is unrelated to Purdue Pharma’s multibillion-dollar bankruptcy
plan, now in legal limbo, that would have offered compensation to tens of thousands
of families. Still, the McKinsey settlement brings closure to one strand of a broad
legal effort to grapple with the industry behind the opioid epidemic.
McKinsey is
widely regarded as the world’s most prestigious management consulting firm, with
offices around the globe from which it advises most of the Fortune 500 companies
as well as government agencies, including those in authoritarian nations such as
China and Saudi Arabia.
In recent years,
McKinsey has settled government investigations in the United States and overseas
by paying hundreds of millions of dollars while not admitting any wrongdoing. That
is no longer true.
McKinsey issued
a statement on Friday apologizing for its work with the opioid maker.
“We are deeply
sorry for our past client service to Purdue Pharma and the actions of a former partner
who deleted documents related to his work for that client,” the consulting firm
wrote. “We should have appreciated the harm opioids were causing in our society
and we should not have undertaken sales and marketing work for Purdue Pharma. This
terrible public health crisis and our past work for opioid manufacturers will always
be a source of profound regret for our firm.”
In court papers
released on Friday, federal prosecutors traced the arc of McKinsey’s work with the
opioid maker.
In July 2009,
McKinsey wrote that Purdue Pharma’s “top priority” should be “driving a more impactful
OxyContin franchise.”
In subsequent
years, as the opioid crisis grew, McKinsey continued to formulate new ways for the
drugmaker to increase profits, including targeting “opioid naïve” patients, a term
used to describe individuals not currently using the drug or those who had used
it only once.
“McKinsey understood
that part of its role was to empower those within Purdue Pharma’s senior management
who favored a more aggressive approach to sales,” federal
prosecutors said.
Reporting in
The New York Times has documented how McKinsey pushed ethical boundaries by advising
drug and cigarette makers while also consulting for their federal regulators, who
never publicly questioned these arrangements.
Congress held
hearings in 2022 focusing on the firm’s simultaneous work with opioid makers and
the Food and Drug Administration after reports in The Times and elsewhere. A congressional report found that since 2010
at least 22 of the firm’s consultants had worked for both Purdue and the F.D.A.,
sometimes at the same time.