India Tightens Content Takedown Rules by Hosting Servers have only 36 hours to Comply Orders

Effective Date 15 November 2025

Legal Authority

·         Issued under:

o    Section 87(1)

o    Clauses (z) and (zg) of Section 87(2) of the Information Technology Act, 2000

Key Amendment: Rule 3(1)(d) Substitution

 Scope of Liability

·         Applies to intermediaries (e.g., social media platforms, hosting providers) where unlawful content is:

o    Hosted

o    Displayed

o    Published

o    Transmitted

o    Stored

Unlawful Content Categories

·         Content prohibited under any law relating to:

o    Sovereignty and integrity of India

o    Security of the State

o    Friendly relations with foreign States

o    Public order

o    Decency or morality

o    Contempt of court

o    Defamation

o    Incitement to offences related to the above

Compliance Timeline

·         36 hours to remove or disable access to such content after receiving “actual knowledge”

Definition of “Actual Knowledge”

Can arise only through:

1.    Court Order

o    From a court of competent jurisdiction

2.    Reasoned Intimation in Writing

o    Issued by an authorized officer:

§  Not below the rank of Joint Secretary (or equivalent) of the Central/State Government

§  Or a Director if Joint Secretary is not appointed

§  Must act through a single authorized agency, if designated

o    If issued by police:

§  Officer must be Deputy Inspector General (DIG) or above

§  Must be specially authorized by the Appropriate Government

Monthly Review Requirement

·         All such takedown intimations must be:

o    Reviewed monthly

o    By an officer not below the rank of Secretary of the Appropriate Government

o    To ensure:

§  Necessity

§  Proportionality

§  Consistency with Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act

Mandatory Details in Intimation

·         Must clearly specify:

o    Legal basis and statutory provision

o    Nature of the unlawful act

o    Precise URL/identifier/location of the content to be removed or disabled

[MeitY Notification G.S.R. 775(E) dated 22 October, 2025]

G.S.R. 775(E).— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1), clauses (z) and (zg) of sub-section (2) of section 87 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules to further amend the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, namely:—

1. (1) These rules may be called the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2025.

(2) They shall come into force on the 15th day of November, 2025.

2. In the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, in rule 3, in sub-rule (1), for clause (d), the following clause shall be substituted, namely:—

“(d) an intermediary, on whose computer resource the information which is used to commit an unlawful act which is prohibited under any law for the time being in force in relation to the interest of the sovereignty and integrity of India; security of the State; friendly relations with foreign States; public order; decency or morality; in relation to contempt of court; defamation; incitement to an offence relating to the above, or any information which is prohibited under any law for the time being in force is hosted, displayed, published, transmitted or stored shall, upon receiving the actual knowledge under clause (b) of sub-section (3) of section 79 of the Act on such information, remove or disable access to such information within thirty-six hours of the receipt of such actual knowledge, and such actual knowledge shall arise only in the following manner, namely:—

(i)    by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction; or

(ii)   a reasoned intimation, in writing,—

(I)    issued by an officer authorised for the purpose of issuing such intimation by the Appropriate Government or its agency, being not below the rank of Joint Secretary or an officer equivalent in rank or where an officer at such rank is not appointed, a Director or an officer equivalent in rank, to the Government of India or to the State Government, as the case may be, and, where so authorised, acting through a single corresponding officer in its authorised agency, where such agency is so appointed:

Provided that where such intimation is to be issued by the police administration, the authorised officer shall not be below the rank of Deputy Inspector General of Police, especially authorised by the Appropriate Government in this behalf:

Provided further that all such intimations shall be subject to periodic review by an officer not below the rank of the Secretary of the concerned Appropriate Government once in every month to ensure that such intimations are necessary, proportionate, and consistent with clause (b) of sub-section (3) of section 79 of the Act and this clause;

(II)  clearly specifying the legal basis and statutory provision invoked, the nature of the unlawful act, and the specific uniform resource locator, identifier or other electronic location of the information, data or communication link required to be removed or disabled;”.

[F. No. 2(4)/2025-CyberLaws]