Pentagon Ropes in Ford Motors for Low Cost Weapon Production
Concerned about the slow pace and high cost
of weapons production, Pentagon officials have begun talks with General Motors and
Ford Motor about producing certain parts.
·
Early-stage talks underway: The
Pentagon has met with executives from Ford Motor and General Motors to explore
support for military production.
·
Focus on components, not weapons:
Discussions center on producing parts and
components, not full weapons systems.
·
Reason for urgency: Ongoing
conflicts (Iran war and Ukraine support) have depleted U.S. military
stockpiles, especially munitions like Patriot interceptors.
·
Push for faster, cheaper production: The
Pentagon is looking to cut costs and speed up manufacturing by tapping
commercial industry capabilities.
·
Policy shift under Trump administration:
o
Criticism of slow, expensive traditional defense contractors
o
Push for off-the-shelf components and
broader industrial participation
·
Historical precedent: Mirrors
World War II efforts when automakers became the “arsenal of democracy,” rapidly
producing military equipment.
·
Auto industry advantage:
o
Expertise in mass production and cost efficiency
o
Ability to scale quickly using existing
manufacturing systems
·
Role of new technologies:
Companies like Stratasys highlight the potential of 3D printing for
producing military parts faster.
·
Key challenge: Military specifications may need
to adapt to commercial manufacturing, otherwise scaling production will
be difficult.
·
Existing ties: General Motors already operates
a defense unit supplying vehicles to the Army.
·
Limitations remain:
o
Some components require rare-earth materials
(often sourced from China)
o
Not all military parts can be produced with current
commercial or 3D-printing methods
·
Core takeaway: The U.S. is exploring a civilian-industrial
partnership to rapidly expand defense production,
but success depends on aligning military needs with commercial capabilities.
The
Pentagon has met with senior executives of Ford Motor and General Motors to gauge
whether the auto industry could help the military acquire vehicles, munitions or
other hardware more quickly and at lower costs, according to three people familiar
with the talks.
The
conversations are in the very early stages, and relate to the possible production
of components by the companies, not entire weapons systems. No specific projects
are currently being negotiated, the people said.
The
discussions with automakers underscore Trump administration efforts to revamp military
procurement as the war in Iran and U.S. support for Ukraine in its war with Russia
deplete supplies. The idea is reminiscent of World War II, when G.M., Ford and other
automakers supplied the military.
“The
Department of War is committed to rapidly expanding the defense
industrial base by leveraging all available commercial solutions and technologies
to ensure our war fighters maintain a decisive advantage,” a Pentagon official said
in a statement in response to questions about the meetings with automakers. “The
department is aggressively pursuing and integrating the best of American innovation,
wherever it resides, to deliver production at scale and drive resiliency across
supply chains.”
The
Wall Street Journal reported earlier on the talks between the Pentagon and the automakers.
The
Trump administration has complained for months that traditional defense contractors take too long to manufacture weapons systems
and charge too much for them. In January, President Trump signed an executive order
that aimed to punish defense contractors that failed to
expand their manufacturing capacity. And in November, the defense
secretary, Pete Hegseth, rolled out a strategy for military procurement that included
buying more widely available off-the-shelf components to avoid the high costs and
delays associated with the specialized systems that the military typically uses.
The
defense industrial base “is stagnant, building the world’s
best and most exquisite weapon systems at low volume while relying on obsolescent
parts, outdated manufacturing processes and stale innovation,” the strategy read.
“In contrast, the commercial industry outpaces the D.I.B. in advancing cutting-edge
technology.”
The
issue has become more urgent because the war in Iran has depleted U.S. stockpiles
of commonly used munitions, such as Patriot missile interceptors. By some estimates,
it could take five years or more to replenish the munitions that have been used
in the last 40 days.
“We
are on borrowed time,” said John Ferrari, a retired Army major general who is now
a nonresident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute,
a research group in Washington. “The Russians, the Chinese, the Iranians, everybody
knows that we don’t have enough munitions.”
The
Pentagon has turned to auto suppliers because U.S. officials remember how Ford and
G.M. revamped production lines during the Covid-19 pandemic to make personal protective
equipment and ventilators.
During
World War II, the U.S. government asked car companies based in and around Detroit
to produce weapons, an industrial mobilization that became famous for building what
President Franklin D. Roosevelt called the “arsenal of democracy.” The Willow Run
factory that Ford built near Ypsilanti, Mich., churned out thousands of planes,
producing about one B-24 Liberator bomber an hour at its peak. But that was possible
only because military officials designed the planes to be built using machinery
Ford already owned, General Ferrari said.
A
big question today is whether the Pentagon will be able adjust its specifications
and requirements to fit the machinery that carmakers use.
“Otherwise,
it is not going to work,” General Ferrari said. “The commercial factories are not
going to go out and buy new machines, and if they did, that would take years.”
While
they gave up making bombers long ago, some automakers continue to work with the
military. G.M., for example, has a defense unit that makes
vehicles for the Army.
Foster
Ferguson, vice president of industrial business at Stratasys, a company that manufactures
3-D printers used by Ford and G.M., said machines that mass-produce parts for the
auto industry could make components for military systems.
The
U.S. military has been exploring the use of 3-D printers to make replacement parts
for older systems, he said, but the devices could also be used to mass-produce other
components. Last month, Stratasys was selected to participate in a military pilot
program to accelerate the qualification and deployment of 3-D-printed parts.
“The
Pentagon is bringing a sense of urgency to the modernization and scaling of defense manufacturing,” said Mr. Ferguson, who served as an
officer in the Marine Corps specializing in supply chain and maintenance operations.
“The automotive industry can make a significant contribution due to their expertise
in economies of scale, cost-down engineering and experience in consistently producing
high-volume, quality parts that meet strict production requirements.”
But
many weapon systems require components that cannot be 3-D printed or need rare-earth
metals mined or processed in China.