Radical Invoicing
Proposal could do Away with GST Returns Chore
· Business-to-Business (B2B) Transactions
· ‘Distinct Invoice Number’ (DIN)
A ‘Committee on Invoice’ set up by the Goods and Services
Tax Council has made two procedural suggestions that, if implemented, could dispense
with the need for businesses to file GST returns, and yet improve compliance and
collections.
The first suggestion relates to business-to-business (B2B)
transactions and could make compliance simple; the second relates to business-to-consumer
(B2C) transactions and will ensure that the final seller of goods or of a service
actually pays the GST collected from end-consumers. The two proposals, which are
in the ‘draft’ stage, are to be placed before the GST Council soon. At the heart
of the first proposal is the recognition that the invoice – which validates every
sale of goods or of a service – is the main document in any transaction and can
capture the value chain and the tax. The invoice has all the details the taxman
needs: the names of the seller and the buyer, the supply date, a description of
the goods or service, the value, and the tax.
The Committee has proposed that each invoice bear a ‘distinct
invoice number’ (DIN), which will be obtained by the seller, if necessary in bulk,
from the GST server, and used serially. The buyer of the goods or the service must
cite the DIN when he, after value addition, raises his own invoice (with its own
DIN), to claim a tax credit. Since both the invoices are uploaded in the GST server,
the two can be matched.
Currently, businesses file GST returns using GSTR 3B form,
which is “a skeletal return with only basic data, not reflecting the finer details
of the invoice,” says a ‘Concept Paper on Invoice’, produced by the Committee. “The
invoice, as such, is not being captured in its raw form anywhere,” it adds.
For B2C transactions, the proposal is for every citizen to
obtain a ‘consumer number’. After a transaction (say, eating at a restaurant), the
consumer can log on to the GST portal and match the DIN (cited in the restaurant
bill) with his/her consumer number. That validates the fact that the consumer paid
GST on the transaction; if no GST is remitted against the DIN, the seller (restaurant
owner) will be punishable. In turn, the consumer can be rewarded for his troubles,
perhaps in the form of tax concessions.
“Today, large-scale evasion happens at the B2C level. This
measure can stop evasion, and revenues could go up by at least 30 per cent,” says
Committee Member S Kannan, who conceptualised the DIN.
And since, under this, all the invoices are available with the department, it will
obviate the need for businesses to file GST returns, Kannan said.