Rising Oil Prices Trigger
Fears of ‘Demand Destruction’ Amid Strait of Hormuz Disruption
The decades-old
term refers to the sustained loss of demand for a commodity, caused by high prices.
Key Points
·
Demand destruction refers to a sustained reduction in demand for a commodity
caused by prolonged high prices, particularly oil.
·
Concerns have
grown as the conflict involving Iran disrupted traffic through the Strait of
Hormuz, a critical global oil transit route.
·
Analysts from
Goldman Sachs noted that oil prices above $100 per barrel are often
associated with significant reductions in oil consumption.
·
The International
Energy Agency (IEA) projected that global oil demand could decline by 1.5
million barrels per day in the current quarter if high prices and supply shortages
persist.
How Demand Destruction Happens
·
Consumers
respond to higher fuel prices by:
o
Driving less.
o
Using virtual
meetings instead of travelling.
o
Choosing closer
vacation destinations.
o
Reducing discretionary
energy consumption.
·
Governments
are also encouraging conservation measures:
o
South Korea
has promoted bicycle use, shorter showers, and reduced government vehicle usage.
Long-Term Impact
·
High oil prices
can accelerate the transition to alternative energy sources, including:
o Electric vehicles (EVs)
o Renewable energy
o Energy-efficient technologies
·
Permanent
behavioral and technological shifts may reduce future
oil demand even after prices stabilize.
Historical Example
·
The most notable
case of demand destruction occurred during the 1970s Energy Crisis.
o
Oil consumption
declined significantly.
o
The crisis
led to fuel-efficiency standards and energy conservation policies in several countries,
including the United States.
Consumer Response
·
Research indicates
lower-income households are already reducing gasoline consumption due to rising
fuel costs.
·
Consumers
often react strongly when fuel prices cross psychological thresholds, such as moving
above $5 per gallon.
Why Prices May Stay Elevated
·
Even if shipping
through the Strait of Hormuz normalizes, prices may remain high because:
o
Energy infrastructure,
including refineries, has been damaged.
o
Refinery repairs
can take months or years.
o
Global supply
chains remain vulnerable to geopolitical disruptions.
Significance
The growing
discussion around demand destruction highlights how sustained high oil prices can
reshape consumer behavior, government policy, and energy
markets. While reduced demand may ease pressure on oil supplies, it also reflects
economic strain on households and businesses, accelerating the shift toward cleaner
and more energy-efficient alternatives.
[ABS News
Service/09.06.2026]
As the war in Iran has stymied traffic through
the Strait of Hormuz, demand for oil has fallen, and industry watchers and oil executives
have started to fret about “demand destruction.” The decades-old term refers to
the sustained loss of demand for a commodity caused by high prices.
In March, Goldman Sachs analysts said that oil
prices hitting $100 a barrel or more (which has happened periodically since Israel
and the United States attacked Iran on Feb. 28) was “associated with more significant
oil demand destruction.” In April, the International Energy Agency, which said it
expected oil demand
to shrink by 1.5 million barrels per day this quarter, noted that it anticipated
that “demand destruction will spread as scarcity and higher prices persist.”
Demand destruction is “not a technical economics
term,” said Catherine Wolfram, a professor of energy economics at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology’s Sloan School of Management. She has seen it used among
oil market traders and those on the financial side of the industry.
In the short term, she said, “people just can’t
afford these higher prices, and so are being forced to find alternatives,” such
as calling into meetings on Zoom to avoid driving, or taking vacations closer to
home to skip plane travel.
In some countries, governments are intervening
to reduce energy usage. South Korea, for one, has advised people
to ride bicycles and take shorter showers, and has told government agencies to take
their vehicles off the road one workday per week.
In the longer term, changes that people — and
governments — make
now, including turning to renewable energy sources, may permanently dampen demand
for oil. “Anyone who bought an electric vehicle is definitely happy to have done
so,” Dr. Wolfram noted. E. V.s make up only a small portion of cars
in the United States (they’re more popular in Europe, where gas
costs much more), but many Americans say they are open
to buying them.
But Dr. Wolfram added that, to her, “the most
worrying thing is the demand that’s not destroyed: the purchases of gasoline or
jet fuel or diesel that people still have to make at these much higher prices.”
The last example of sustained demand destruction,
said Ryan Kellogg, a professor focused on energy policy at the University of Chicago,
came during the 1970s energy crisis. It reduced petroleum demand for a long period
and led to the adoption of fuel-economy standards in the United States. Oil prices
since then have been volatile at times — they soared in 2007 and 2008 as global
demand surged, and crashed at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. Russia’s invasion
of Ukraine in 2022 set off a new spike. Now prices are volatile again — and, if
they continue rising, behaviors may continue to shift.
Consumers tend to be quite “attentive to first
digits,” Dr. Wolfram noted; they may react more strongly to a gasoline price of
$5.01 than $4.99. Already, some lower-income consumers have cut
back slightly on gas, according to research from the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York.
Even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens soon,
prices may not simply return to normal, partly because oil prices are also tied
to other factors. “The Iranians have bombed refineries that produce gasoline and
jet fuel, so there’s been some physical destruction that will take a lot longer
to repair,” Dr. Wolfram said.
“People just can’t afford these higher prices,
and so are being forced to find alternatives,” she reflected. “Hopefully, those
alternatives are palatable.”