SpaceX Gets Billions from the Government.
It Gives Little to Nothing Back in Taxes.
Elon Musk’s
rocket company relies on federal contracts, but years of losses have most likely
let it avoid paying federal income taxes, according to internal company documents.
Massive
Federal Support, Minimal Tax Contribution
·
SpaceX,
founded by Elon Musk in 2002, has received billions in federal contracts from NASA,
the Pentagon, and other agencies.
·
Despite
this, internal documents reveal SpaceX has likely paid little to no federal income
taxes since its inception.
Tax
Loss Carry forwards
·
By 2021,
SpaceX had accumulated over $5 billion in losses, which it can use to offset
future taxable income.
·
A 2017
change under President Trump removed the expiration date on these tax benefits,
allowing $3 billion in losses to be applied indefinitely.
Financial
Snapshot
·
In 2020,
84% of SpaceX’s revenue came from federal contracts; in 2021, it was 76%.
·
The company
reported $5 billion in earnings from core operations last year, up from $2.6
billion in 2023.
·
Revenue
is projected to hit $15.5 billion in 2025, driven largely by its Starlink
satellite internet service.
Tax
Payments Elsewhere
·
SpaceX
has paid small amounts in state and foreign taxes but almost none federally.
·
In 2021,
it paid $483,000 to foreign governments and $78,000 in state taxes.
Expert
Opinions
·
Tax experts
say the scale of tax avoidance is notable given SpaceX’s reliance on public funds.
·
Critics
argue the tax benefits were meant for struggling companies, not thriving giants
like SpaceX.
Influence
and Investors
·
SpaceX
is valued at over $350 billion, making it one of the world’s most valuable
private companies.
·
Investors
include Fidelity, Google, and individuals like Len Blavatnik and Chris Anderson
(TED Talks).
[ABS
News Service/16.08.2025]
SpaceX,
Elon Musk’s rocket and satellite internet company, has received billions of dollars
in federal contracts over its more than two-decade existence.
But SpaceX
has most likely paid little to no federal income taxes since its founding in 2002
and has privately told investors that it may never have to pay any, according to
internal company documents reviewed by The New York Times.
The rocket
maker’s finances have long been secret because the company is privately held. But
the documents reviewed by The Times show that SpaceX can seize on a legal tax benefit
that allows it to use the more than $5 billion in losses it racked up by late 2021
to offset paying future taxable income. President Trump made a change in 2017, during
his first term, that eliminated the tax benefit’s expiration date for all companies.
For SpaceX, that means that nearly $3 billion of its losses can be indefinitely
applied against future taxable income.
Tax experts
consulted by The Times said that not having to pay $5 billion in federal income
taxes was substantial and notable for a company that has relied on contracts with
the U.S. government to an unusual degree. SpaceX works closely with the Pentagon,
NASA and other agencies, giving it a vital role in national security. In 2020, federal
contracts generated almost 84 percent of the rocket maker’s revenue, according to
the documents, a figure that had not been previously reported.
Larger
tech companies — including some that have taken advantage of the tax benefit — often
pay billions in federal income taxes. Microsoft, for one, said it expected to pay
$14.1 billion in federal income taxes in its last fiscal year.
SpaceX
can use the tax benefit even if its business thrives. By one measure of corporate
profitability, the company had roughly $5 billion in earnings from its core operations
last year, up from $2.6 billion in 2023, according to what the company has privately
told some stakeholders.
Danielle
Brian, the executive director of the Project on Government Oversight, a group that
investigates corruption and waste in the government, said the tax benefit had historically
been aimed at encouraging companies to stay in business during difficult times.
It was
“quaint” that SpaceX was using it, she said, as it “was clearly not intended for
a company doing so well.”
Mr. Musk
has built SpaceX into one of the world’s most influential companies, which dominates
the space industry through its rockets and its Starlink
satellite internet service.
It has been a jewel in the crown of his business empire and an essential source
of his wealth and power, along with his electric vehicle company, Tesla. It has
also given Mr. Musk a perch on the world stage, allowing him to weigh in on geopolitics.
Like many
tech start-ups, SpaceX lost money as it plowed billions
of dollars into building its business. Uber, Amazon, Tesla and other tech firms were
also not profitable for years. As SpaceX has grown, the firm has been valued at
more than $350 billion, crowning it one of the world’s most valuable private companies,
according to the start-up tracker PitchBook.
Several
news organizations have reported on aspects of SpaceX’s finances, which the company
discloses to its investors and other stakeholders. But the documents reviewed by
The Times — including income statements and balance sheets covering 23 years — offered
new insight into SpaceX’s revenue sources, investors and taxes.
SpaceX
appears to have paid some income taxes over the years, though likely not to the
federal government, according to the documents. In one document, the company said
it expected to pay $483,000 in income tax to foreign governments and $78,000 in
state income tax in 2021. Separately, it reported paying $6,000 for income taxes
in 2020 and 2021, but did not disclose if the payments were for federal, state or
local governments.
SpaceX
and Mr. Musk did not respond to requests for comment. Mr. Musk has often trumpeted
SpaceX’s role in carrying out missions for NASA and other agencies. In June, he
proudly posted on social media that the company had reached
a milestone, as its “commercial revenue from space will exceed the entire budget
of @NASA next year.”
Mr. Musk,
who left his role as a close
adviser to Mr. Trump in late
May, founded SpaceX with the goal of shuttling
humans to Mars and colonizing
the Red Planet. He owned 44 percent of the company as of 2022, according to the
documents.
Getting
to Mars is an expensive endeavor, and SpaceX’s losses
piled up from the start. In its first year of operation in 2002, the company lost
about $4 million, the documents show. The next year, it lost $14.5 million. Those
losses ballooned in subsequent years, reaching $341 million in 2020. In 2021, it
lost $968 million.
All the
while, Mr. Musk and Gwynne Shotwell, the president of SpaceX, pushed the company
to grow. It began developing
and testing Starship, a reusable
rocket that Mr. Musk hopes will one day reach Mars.
By the
end of 2021, SpaceX had accumulated almost $5.4 billion in tax losses, according
to the most recent figure in the documents. Those losses generated the tax benefit,
known as a net operating loss carryforward. It enables
SpaceX to avoid federal income taxes on an equivalent amount of future taxable income.
The benefit is available to all companies, including start-ups that lose money for
years before turning a profit.
In one
document, SpaceX told investors that it was “more likely than not that some portion
or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized,” meaning it might never
pay taxes. The company cited, among other things, its past losses. Such language
can be common for companies with a history of losses, and this outlook can be revised
if their finances improve, said Robert Willens, an accounting analyst who runs his
own firm.
SpaceX
also benefited from a sweeping package of tax cuts that Mr. Trump signed in 2017.
One change was eliminating a 20-year limit on the use of tax-loss carryforwards, meaning that losses generated after 2017 no longer
expired. That change allows SpaceX to apply nearly $3 billion in carryforwards indefinitely.
In addition,
the company had $227 million in carryforwards that could
offset state income taxes, the documents show. It had more than $1.1 billion in
other federal and state tax credits.
“Given
the size of its net operating loss, the company almost surely didn’t pay any federal
tax for years,” said Gregg Polsky, who teaches tax law at New York University School
of Law. “And it’s so large, it’s unlikely it has paid taxes even if it has had positive
taxable income in recent years.”
The tax
benefits may have come in handy in recent years as SpaceX’s finances have improved,
at least by one measure. The company has privately said its earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization nearly doubled to roughly $5 billion last year
from 2023. That figure, known as EBITDA, is one way of measuring corporate profits
but is not the same as the bottom line and does not mean that SpaceX is paying taxes.
Starting
in the mid-2000s, SpaceX began landing hundreds of federal contracts, including
one with NASA to deliver cargo to the International Space Station and another with
a U.S. intelligence agency for $1.8 billion to
provide spy satellites.
Some contracts are expected to generate substantial revenue for years, according
to the documents.
The documents,
reviewed by The Times, provide the first insights into how heavily SpaceX depends
on federal contracts. In 2020, they generated about $1.4 billion, or 83.8 percent,
of the company’s total revenue that year. The next year, federal contracts brought
in about $1.7 billion, or 76 percent, of the total revenue, the documents show.
Mr. Musk
said
in June that he expected
SpaceX’s revenue to reach $15.5 billion this year. That is up from about $7.4 billion
in 2023, the documents show. (Revenue includes sales of the company’s products.)
A big
part of that growth stems from Starlink, which has six million subscribers, according
to the company. The documents
showed that SpaceX told investors that Starlink had 2.5 million users in 2023 and
generated roughly $8 billion in revenue last year, more than double the previous
year’s revenue and outpacing SpaceX’s rocket division in both years.
The documents
do not include SpaceX’s net profits or losses for the past two years. The Wall Street Journal reported that the company generated $55 million in
profit on $1.5 billion in revenue in the first quarter of 2023. Companies can simultaneously
report profits to shareholders and tax losses to the I.R.S. in any given year because
of the differences in how certain items are treated.
To fund
SpaceX, Mr. Musk has relied on longtime investors like Fidelity
and Google and friends
like Antonio Gracias, who is also a SpaceX board member. The documents reviewed
by The Times identified others who had not been publicly associated with the company.
A company
called AI RT SPX Holdings is listed as an investor on a 2020 document. It appears
to be affiliated with Access Industries, an investment firm founded by Len Blavatnik,
the billionaire investor who was born in Ukraine and raised in Moscow and made
his fortune in the privatization
era in the 1990s after the Soviet Union collapsed. Now a British and American citizen,
he has become a prolific philanthropist and investor in American and European companies.
The document
was signed by two Access executives, including Mr. Blavatnik’s brother Alex Blavatnik.
It is unclear whether Access Industries remains a SpaceX investor. Through a spokeswoman,
Mr. Blavatnik declined to comment.
Chris
Anderson, the entrepreneur who is the head of the organization behind TED Talks,
appears to have invested in SpaceX through a company called Excalbians.
He did not respond to requests for comment. Mr. Musk has delivered several
TED Talks in the past.