Sugar Policy Mismanagement Leaves India “More Sour
than Sweet”, Pak has Ready Stocks at 30% Lower than India
·
C. Rangarajan’s 2012 recommendation: The
former C. Rangarajan Committee had recommended dismantling the 10%
compulsory levy sugar system for ration shops and allowing sugar prices to
be determined by market forces of demand and supply, providing greater
freedom to sugar mills.
·
Reform not implemented: The
recommended market-oriented reform was never fully adopted. Government agencies
continue to exercise extensive control over the sugar sector, including
production, procurement from farmers and stock management.
·
Extensive government controls: Sugar
mills and traders are required to declare stocks online every week,
while prescribed stock limits remain in place. Violations can attract penalties
under the Essential Commodities Act, including criminal prosecution.
·
Contradiction over rising prices: Despite
these extensive monitoring requirements, the government has argued that it was
unaware of developments contributing to the recent rise in sugar prices. This
raises questions about the effectiveness of the existing regulatory system.
·
Pakistan comparison: Sugar
prices in Pakistan are reportedly around 30% lower than in India,
despite broadly similar production conditions. The IMF is pushing Pakistan
towards deregulation of its sugar sector.
·
Pakistan eyes Indian market:
Following India's temporary decision to allow duty-free raw-sugar imports, the Pakistan
Sugar Mills Association (PSMA) has urged Islamabad to permit sugar exports
directly to India. Pakistan's sugar mills reportedly see India as a nearby
market that could help clear inventories and generate as much as $600
million in foreign exchange.
·
Potential India–Pakistan trade logic: If
political and security restrictions were overcome, cross-border sugar trade
could potentially reduce transport costs, improve regional supply efficiency
and benefit consumers on both sides.
·
International prices argument questioned: The
explanation that international sugar prices pushed up Indian prices is
questioned because India's sugar imports and exports remain heavily
controlled/restricted. With limited integration with the global market,
domestic policy and supply management have a much stronger influence on prices.
·
Delayed imports: The
temporary decision to permit duty-free imports of raw sugar from Brazil
may provide relief only after a considerable delay because the imported raw
sugar needs to be refined before reaching consumers. This could allow
importers/refiners to benefit from the prevailing price differential. Sugar crushing in India for new season will
not start before November since the crop needs time to mature and reach high
sucrose content.
·
Wider commodity-management problem: Similar
concerns are visible in onion markets, where prices have reportedly
climbed to around ₹60 per kg, highlighting the recurring problem
of government intervention failing to prevent sharp swings in essential
commodity prices. It is alleged that 30% of Onions held in Government
warehouses has rotted due to bad handling.
·
Maize–ethanol trade-off:
Increased use of maize for ethanol blending in petrol is also affecting
the availability of maize for poultry feed. Higher feed costs are contributing
to rising egg prices, illustrating how intervention in one commodity
market can create shortages and inflation elsewhere.
Bottom line: The
central argument is that excessive administrative control over sugar, onions
and other agricultural commodities is producing the very shortages and price
volatility that the controls are supposed to prevent. The piece advocates a
return to market-based pricing, freer trade and less bureaucratic
intervention—ending with a sarcastic reference to Mann Ki Baat for an explanation of what consumers should do.
[ABS
News Service/27.08.2026]
Prof.
C Rangarajan Eco Professor and former Governor of RBI recommended to the government
to dismantle the 10 percent compulsory levy sugar for the ration shop, giving relief
to the mills.
That
was in 2012
The
price of sugar was to be determined by market forces of demand and supply.
The
reform was never adopted, the sugar directorate decides how much each mill will
produce, what is it will give to the farmer.
The
traders and mills have to declare stocks on line every week, there are fixed limits
to stocks.
Jail
is the penalty under the Essential Commodities Act.
The
irony is that the government claims that it did not know what the mills were doing,
hence the detection rising sugar price was late.
The
joke is that the minister claims rise in international price affected the Indian
price, when the fact is that both exports and imports are practically banned so
India is indicated from the rest of the world!
Thus the second largest producer of sugar in
the world is in the soup, more sour than sweet🤩
Pak sugar is 30 percent cheaper than India. Same conditions
as India.
IMF is forcing Pak to deregulate the sector.
Eyeing the Indian Market: Following India's decision to temporarily
allow duty-free raw sugar imports to stabilize its own domestic prices, the Pakistan
Sugar Mills Association (PSMA) has actively urged the government to permit sugar
exports directly to India. While political and security tensions keep the borders
closed, millers are desperate to tap into this nearby market to clear inventory
and secure up to $600 million in foreign exchange
Trading with them will save transport cost and create good neighbours!
(Tailpiece-
the duty free imports from Brazil have another two months to refine the raw sugar.
So the infusion of import into the Indian market will be
very late, till then the Singapore based Wilmar will reap the windfall.)
Same
story of market mismanagement of onions with price hitting 60 rupees
And
ethyl alcohol made from maize for petrol blending is creating shortage of poultry
feed. Egg prices are up.