U.S. Imposes Section 301 Tariffs on 60 Economies over Forced Labour Import Controls

·         Final Section 301 Action: On 23 July 2026, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), under President Donald Trump's direction, imposed Section 301 tariffs on 60 economies for failing to impose and effectively enforce bans on imports of goods produced with forced labour.

·         Objective: The action aims to address what the U.S. considers both a human rights concern and an unfair trade practice that burdens U.S. commerce.

·         Investigation Process:

o    60 Section 301 investigations were initiated on 12 March 2026.

o    USTR held two rounds of public hearings and consulted with more than 45 governments.

o    Received over 2,100 public comments during the investigations and more than 1,600 comments on the proposed tariff action.

o    More than 100 witnesses testified during hearings held from 7–9 July 2026.

·         Section 301 Determination: On 2 June 2026, USTR concluded that the investigated economies' failure to prohibit and effectively enforce bans on forced labour imports was unreasonable and burdened U.S. commerce, making the practices actionable under Section 301(b) of the Trade Act of 1974.

·         Tariff Rates:

o    10% Section 301 tariff applies to economies that:

§  Already have a forced labour import prohibition;

§  Have committed to adopt and enforce such a prohibition under an Agreement on Reciprocal Trade; or

§  Have implemented a partial regime preventing imports of certain forced labour goods.

o    Countries subject to the 10% tariff include:

§  Argentina, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Canada, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Jordan, Malaysia, Mexico, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Trinidad and Tobago, and the United Kingdom.

o    European Union, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and Switzerland will face 10% or 12.5% tariffs (net of the MFN rate) on specified products.

o    All other investigated economies will face a 12.5% Section 301 tariff.

·         Product Exemptions: USTR granted exemptions for:

o    Raw materials critical to domestic supply.

o    Products whose tariffs could cause economy-wide disruptions.

o    Products unavailable in sufficient quantity or at reasonable prices from U.S. or alternative sources.

o    Certain products from economies making progress on forced labour import prohibitions.

o    Products where tariffs would not significantly contribute to eliminating the identified practices.

·         U.S. Position: Ambassador Jamieson Greer stated that decades of voluntary efforts have failed to eliminate forced labour from global supply chains and emphasized that trading partners should adopt and effectively enforce import bans similar to those already in place in the United States.

·         Significance for India: India is among the economies subject to the 10% Section 301 tariff, reflecting the U.S. assessment that it has taken steps toward restricting imports of goods produced with forced labour but remains subject to the new enforcement framework.

 

[ABS News Service/24.07.2026]

On 23 July, 2026, Ambassador Jamieson Greer is taking final action, at President Trump’s direction, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 by imposing tariffs on 60 economies for their failure to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor.  Today’s action comes after the Office of the United States Trade Representative’s (USTR) investigations, which included two rounds of public hearings, more than 2,100 public comments, and engagement with our trading partners to remedy these longstanding concerns.

“President Trump recognizes that decades of moral suasion have not eradicated forced labor from global supply chains.  The United States has had a forced labor import ban for nearly a century, and rigorously enforces it; it’s well past time for our trading partners to do the same,” said Ambassador Greer.  “Today’s action will begin to correct what is both a human rights abuse and distortive trade practice to improve the welfare of workers everywhere.  I am encouraged by the trading partners who have moved quickly to adopt forced labor import prohibitions, and look forward to ensuring their effective enforcement.”

Background

Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (Trade Act), is designed to address unfair foreign practices affecting U.S. commerce.  Section 301 may be used to respond to unjustifiable, unreasonable, or discriminatory foreign government acts, policies, or practices that burden or restrict U.S. commerce.  A Section 301(b) investigation examines whether the acts, policies, or practices are unreasonable or discriminatory and burden or restrict U.S. commerce.

At the specific direction of the President, on March 12, 2026, the U.S. Trade Representative initiated 60 investigations related to the failure of various economies to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor.  On April 28 and April 29, 2026, USTR and the Section 301 Committee convened public hearings regarding these investigations.  Pursuant to Section 303(a) of the Trade Act, USTR also held consultations with more than 45 of the governments of the economies subject to the investigations.

On June 2, 2026, the U.S. Trade Representative determined under Section 301 of the Trade Act that the acts, policies, and practices of the 60 investigated economies related to the failure to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is unreasonable and burdens or restricts U.S. commerce, and are thus actionable under Section 301(b) of the Trade Act.  As a result of this determination, the U.S. Trade Representative proposed responsive action and invited the public to provide written comments on the proposed action by July 6, 2026.  USTR received, reviewed, and analyzed over 1,600 written comments on the proposed responsive action.  From July 7 to July 9, USTR also held public hearings regarding proposed responsive action in the investigations, at which over 100 witnesses provided testimony and responded to questions.

Consistent with the specific direction of the President, the U.S. Trade Representative has made the following determinations:

·         10 percent is the appropriate rate of Section 301 duties for investigated economies that (i) impose a forced labor import prohibition; (ii) have committed to impose and enforce such a prohibition through an Agreement on Reciprocal Trade; or (iii) have imposed a partial regime with the effect of preventing the importation of certain forced labor goods.  These economies are: Argentina, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Canada, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Jordan, Malaysia, Mexico, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Trinidad and Tobago, and the United Kingdom;

·         10 percent or 12.5 percent, net of Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate is the appropriate rate of Section 301 duties for certain products of the European Union, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, and Switzerland that are not otherwise exempted, as explained in greater detail in the Federal Register Notice; and

·         12.5 percent is the appropriate rate of Section 301 duty for all other investigated economies.

The U.S. Trade Representative has also determined, in accordance with the specific direction of the President, that product exemptions are appropriate for: (a) raw materials that if subject to these tariffs could lead to the unavailability of domestic supply; (b) products that could cause economy-wide disruptions if subject to these tariffs; (c) products that cannot be grown or produced in sufficient quantities or at reasonable prices in the United States or obtained from other sources; (d) certain products of Argentina, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Ecuador, El Salvador, the European Union, Guatemala, Indonesia, Jordan, Malaysia, Switzerland, Taiwan, or the United Kingdom that would encourage these economies to fulfill commitments regarding forced labor import prohibitions or to enact and effectively enforce a forced labor import prohibition; or (e) articles for which these tariffs may not contribute substantially to the elimination of the acts, policies, and practices of found to be actionable in the investigations.