U.K. and Europe Alarmed by Trump’s Russian Diesel Deal, Reaffirm Support for Ukraine

Shocked by the U.S. agreement with Russia, which Ukraine has called “a gift” to President Putin, officials in Europe have coalesced around a cautious diplomatic message.

· President Trump’s proposed deal to buy Russian diesel fuel could inject an estimated $4 billion into Russia’s economy, undermining Western efforts to weaken Moscow’s war financing.

· Britain, Germany and the European Union reaffirmed their support for Ukraine and commitment to maintaining sanctions against Russia, while avoiding direct criticism of Trump.

· EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas urged stronger pressure on Russia, arguing that it was essential to ending the war.

· Trump defended his decision under the “America First” policy and criticized Europe for continuing to purchase Russian energy.

· Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk called for increased sanctions and greater solidarity among Western nations.

· The disputed announcement of an energy ceasefire further exposed divisions between Washington and its European allies over how to end the Ukraine war.

[ABS News Service/13.10.2026]

European and British officials were stunned by President Trump’s unexpected announcement that he had made a deal with President Vladimir V. Putin to purchase Russian diesel fuel. But they were in a bind on how to respond.

The arrangement, which President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine called “a gift” to President Putin, directly undercuts years of effort by dozens of countries — including the United States — to cut Russia off from the money that fuels Mr. Putin’s war of aggression in Ukraine.

Energy experts have said that the diesel agreement, if it goes ahead, could send some $4 billion of American money into the Russian economy.

Mr. Trump’s announcement on Friday afternoon of his “highly successful discussion” with Mr. Putin was all the more shocking in Europe as it came after Russia conducted several brutal strikes in Ukraine, killing 22 people including three babies in an apartment block on Wednesday and at least 30 people in a bus on Thursday.

For European leaders, the dilemma over the past three days has been familiar: How to support Ukraine in a moment of acute diplomatic peril, without triggering Mr. Trump’s ire?

As they scrambled for a response, they have stopped short of directly criticizing the American president and coalesced around a single diplomatic message: We are not changing our own approach to Russia, and we stand by Ukraine.

On Saturday, Britain announced that Prime Minister Andy Burnham had spoken to Mr. Zelensky, noting that he had begun the call “by recognizing the last 24 hours had been difficult for Ukraine” — an oblique reference to Mr. Trump’s intervention — and had “reiterated his complete solidarity.” The statement added that Mr. Burnham would meet with Mr. Zelensky in the coming days.

A spokesman for the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, told reporters that the government was “standing by the sanctions decisions against Russia and is working together with its European partners on further sanctions.”

Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s top diplomat, began her comments to reporters on Monday with a conciliatory nod to the United States, before saying that the bloc was “continuing our path” of trying to keep Russia from enriching itself by blocking the sale of oil and gas on the global market.

“The U.S. is our biggest ally, but our message is clear,” she said while entering a meeting of foreign affairs ministers in Luxembourg. “If we want to end this war, the only way we can do this is by putting more pressure on Russia.”

Margus Tsahkna, the minister of foreign affairs for Estonia, was more blunt.

“We have had this kind of turbulence and also pressure from President Trump’s side to Ukraine before,” he said. “So we need to focus on what we can do.”

Mr. Trump responded to the European reaction on his TruthSocial site Monday afternoon.

“The European Union paid Russia 250 Billion Dollars for Energy, and the Fake News Media doesn’t want to get near that story,” the president wrote, possibly referring to European purchases of Russian oil since Russia invaded. “I made the right choice for the American People — ALWAYS, AMERICA FIRST!”

It is true that the European Union continues to buy Russian energy, though the bloc has been working to wean itself off it and has sharply reduced its dependence.

Since beginning his second term, Mr. Trump has repeatedly indicated support for Russia’s positions over those of Ukraine. Before his re-election, the president promised to end the war in 24 hours and has on several occasions blamed Mr. Zelensky for the continued fighting.

“I suggest they get a new leader who can make a deal, because he could have made many deals and for some reason he never does,” Mr. Trump said Saturday.

On Sunday, the president announced that Russia and Ukraine had agreed to an “ENERGY CEASEFIRE,” though neither side confirmed that such an agreement existed. Several European leaders on Monday welcomed such a cease-fire but noted that Russia struck Ukrainian energy facilities after the announcement.

For European officials, the latest example of the president’s go-it-alone diplomacy with Mr. Putin strikes at the heart of their attempts to maintain a consensus on opposing Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Nearly three dozen countries, including Britain, France and Germany, formed what they called the “coalition of the willing” last year to demonstrate their resolve in supporting Ukraine.

None of the countries want to engage in a direct military confrontation with Russia. Instead, they have focused on helping Ukraine acquire weapons to defend itself. And they have used economic sanctions designed to cut Russia off from its most lucrative exports.

On Monday, Prime Minister Donald Tusk of Poland urged the United States and other European nations to increase sanctions — not back away from them.

“This message must go out today from every capital, from Warsaw to Washington,” he said. “I am certain that our response in the coming hours, weeks and months will be one of full solidarity and determination on the part of the free world, all capitals and all political leaders.”

He added, in words that signaled a more complicated reality: “I very much hope so.”