USMCA Faces Uncertain Future as Trump
Pushes Major Revisions to North American Trade Pact
The economy of Laredo, Texas, has boomed
under the president’s global tariffs. Now, his demands may threaten its success.
1. North American Trade Under Review
o
The Trump
administration has begun negotiations to substantially revise the United States-Mexico-Canada
Agreement (USMCA), citing concerns over the growing U.S. trade deficit with Mexico.
2. Laredo at the Centre of U.S.-Mexico Trade
o
Laredo, Texas,
handles about 40% of U.S.-Mexico trade and has become the largest U.S. port
by trade value, surpassing Los Angeles, JFK Airport and Chicago O'Hare.
3. Trade Shift Driven by Tariffs on China
o
Trump's tariffs
on China encouraged manufacturers to relocate production to Mexico, making Mexico
the largest source of U.S. imports since 2023.
4. USMCA Renewal in Doubt
o
President
Trump declined to renew USMCA on 1 July, triggering a 10-year countdown
to its expiry unless a new agreement is reached.
5. Pressure on Canada
o
The administration
announced a 50% tariff on several Canadian products, including plywood, paper
and cement, apparently to strengthen its negotiating position.
6. Mexico Negotiations More Constructive
o
Discussions
with Mexico have progressed more smoothly, although Washington seeks major changes
to manufacturing rules and market access.
7. Higher U.S. Content Requirements Proposed
o
The United
States proposes:
§ Increasing North American content in automobiles from
75% to 82%.
§ Requiring 50% U.S. content in vehicles.
§ Introducing stricter origin rules for electronics and
other products.
8. Focus on Chinese Goods
o
Washington
wants Mexico to strengthen measures preventing Chinese goods from entering the U.S.
through Mexico.
o
Mexico has
begun overhauling its customs system to improve traceability of components and raw
materials.
9. Cross-Border Supply Chains Remain Deeply Integrated
o
Vehicles,
electronics and industrial goods move repeatedly across the border during production.
o
U.S.-made
components are exported to Mexican factories, while finished products return to
the U.S. market.
10. Business Concern Over Uncertainty
o
Companies
in Laredo report slower investment as firms postpone warehouse expansion and other
projects until the future of USMCA becomes clearer.
11. Importance of Mexico for U.S. Exports
o
Supporters
argue Mexico is not only a major supplier but also one of America's largest export
markets, supporting U.S. jobs through integrated manufacturing supply chains.
12. Criticism from Labour Groups
o
The United
Auto Workers (UAW) describes NAFTA and USMCA as a "free trade disaster."
o
It proposes:
§ A North American minimum manufacturing wage.
§ Requiring vehicles sold in the U.S. to be manufactured
domestically.
§ U.S. withdrawal from USMCA if stronger labour standards
are not adopted.
13. Implementation Gaps
o
Critics argue
several USMCA labour and wage provisions were weakly enforced.
o
Some automakers
reportedly chose to pay the 2.5% import tariff instead of complying with
more demanding origin rules.
14. Industry Opposition
o
Auto manufacturers
warn that stricter origin requirements could make North American production less
competitive and encourage production in Asia, where imports face relatively lower
U.S. tariffs.
15. Negotiations Expected to be Prolonged
o
Talks with
Mexico are ongoing, while formal negotiations with Canada have yet to begin.
o
Analysts expect
a lengthy and difficult negotiation process rather than a quick agreement.
16. Investment Impact
o
Policy uncertainty
surrounding tariffs and USMCA is discouraging new investment in logistics, manufacturing
and warehousing along the U.S.-Mexico border.
17. Laredo's Economy Depends on USMCA
o
Around 18,000
trucks cross Laredo's bridges every day.
o
Local businesses
view USMCA as fundamental to the region's prosperity and argue that North America
is economically stronger through integrated continental production.
[ABS News Service/22.07.2026]
Tractor-trailers
rumble through the gates of the World Trade Bridge, punctuated by the squeals of
air brakes and growls of engines. South of the border, a line of trucks stretches
back into Mexico, extending for more than a mile at the busiest times.
President
Trump’s tariffs have reshaped America’s trading relationship with the world. Imports
from countries like China have steadily fallen as tariffs went into effect. As a
result, manufacturers have sought low-cost factories closer to home, prompting a
boom in trade between the United States and Mexico.
Laredo,
Texas, has been a winner from the shift. A border city on the Rio Grande, it directly
connects the factories surrounding Monterrey, Mexico, about 150 miles away, with
Interstate 35, a central artery in the United States, and other highways that carry
Mexican products throughout the country. Roughly 40 percent of U.S.-Mexico trade
passes through Laredo.
That
trade is now in question as Mr. Trump demands changes to the North American trade
agreement that has stitched together the economies of Mexico, Canada and the United
States for more than three decades. In negotiations in Mexico City this week, U.S.
officials will push for significant revisions to the trade deal the president signed
during his first term — the United States Mexico Canada Agreement — which replaced
NAFTA. Under those deals, goods have been allowed to move between the countries
tariff free, as long as they follow the rules of the pact.
Mr.
Trump has already taken a highly disruptive approach to North American trade. He
has threatened to scrap U.S.M.C.A. altogether unless the United States gets a better
deal, a disastrous scenario for the businesses that depend on it. On July 1, he
declined to renew the agreement, starting a 10-year clock for its expiration. And
on Monday, Mr. Trump signed orders to impose a 50 percent tariff, starting next
month, on Canadian goods ranging from plywood and paper to cement and hockey sticks,
a move some speculated was an effort to force Canada to the negotiating table.
Negotiations
with Mexico have been smoother, but U.S. officials say they want to see big changes
to the relationship. Since U.S.M.C.A. was signed in 2018, the U.S. trade deficit
in goods with Mexico has more than doubled, irking Mr. Trump. U.S. officials want
their Mexican counterparts to adopt changes to the pact that would require manufacturing
more products in the United States and give U.S. companies greater access to the
Mexican market. Mr. Trump has put tariffs on some goods from Mexico, including steel,
copper and tomatoes, but most U.S.M.C.A. goods continue to come into the United
States tariff free.
Laredo
is still betting on the deal’s survival. It is investing in new warehouses and the
expansion of the World Trade Bridge and other border crossings. Imports of computers,
cars, cellphones, tractors and air-conditioners move through
the port from Mexico, and car parts, diesel engines, plastics, refined copper and
batteries are sent back as part of the cross-border trade that has become key to
a range of industries, including automobiles.
Laredo
has edged out the Chicago O’Hare International Airport, New York’s John F. Kennedy
International Airport and the Port of Los Angeles to become the country’s biggest
port by dollar value this year.
“Hopefully
it’ll keep rolling and everything will keep flowing through,” said Don Booth, 66,
as he walked through a massive warehouse he manages north of the border. Giant fans
stirred the hot air of the warehouse, which housed roughly 6,000 sleek off-road
vehicles manufactured in Monterrey, Mexico, by Polaris, a Minnesota-based company.
Tractor-trailers
waited at loading bays surrounding the factory to carry the Mexican-made vehicles
to distributors across the United States. Other trucks would be filled with U.S.-made
chassis, motors, tires and shocks, and sent southward to feed the company’s Monterrey
plant.
Mr.
Booth said that he had seen business slow as Mr. Trump issued tariff threats and
companies tried to regroup. He said he was “wary” about the effect of tariffs, but
overall business was flowing well. “Mexico is a good partner,” he added.
Supporters
of the North American trade deal argue that Mexican imports are still beneficial
for the United States. In addition to supplying U.S. consumers with the cheap and
plentiful products they’re used to, Mexico is also the United States’ largest export
market after the European Union. Many goods manufactured in Mexican factories are
made with cotton, plastics and petroleum that is produced by American workers.
Others
supporters of the pact argue that having access to low-cost production in Mexico
helps make U.S. companies more competitive against rivals from Asia or Europe.
But
the trade deal also has plenty of critics, who say that lower wages in Mexican factories
continue to undercut U.S. manufacturing jobs.
In
a white paper published in June, the United Automobile Workers union called U.S.M.C.A.
and its predecessor, NAFTA, a “free trade disaster.” The union proposed adding a
new minimum manufacturing wage for North America, and a requirement for companies
to manufacture cars in the United States if they want to sell them there.
“If
these standards are not met, the United States should withdraw from the U.S.M.C.A.,”
the union said.
To
some, it seems curious why Mr. Trump is criticizing the deal he himself signed.
At the time, he called it a “colossal victory” that would end “the NAFTA nightmare.”
Though
USMCA kept much of the structure of NAFTA intact, it also contained revisions intended
to increase U.S. manufacturing. USMCA required automakers to make more of their
cars in North America to qualify for zero tariffs under the pact. It also required
Mexico to strengthen its labor laws, among other changes.
But
critics argue that those changes were not fully realized. The U.A.W. says that automakers
simply ignored some of the more complicated rules, like the requirement to have
workers earning at least $16 an hour make more of a car’s content. Instead, some
companies chose to sidestep the USMCA rules by simply paying a tariff of 2.5 percent
to import cars. In Mexico, corrupt unions maintained control,
and labor reforms were only partial, the U.A.W. says.
Others
argue imports from Mexico have boomed in part because of Mr. Trump’s own actions.
In his first term, the tariffs the president imposed on China — the world’s biggest
manufacturer — sent companies scuttling to other locations with cheap labor so that they could continue to supply U.S. consumers with
inexpensive products. In 2023, Mexico surpassed China as the top source of U.S.
imports.
This
time around, U.S. officials have proposed raising USMCA’s requirement for how much
of a car must be made in North America to 82 percent from 75 percent. They have
also suggested requiring 50 percent of a car’s content to come from the United States.
U.S.
officials have proposed new content requirements for other products, such as electronics.
They are also pressing Mexican officials to do more to block Chinese goods from
coming through Mexico into the United States. This year, Mexico began a substantial
overhaul of its customs system to better track the components and raw materials
in exports to the United States.
In
an interview with The New York Times last month, Jamieson Greer, the U.S. trade
representative, said officials had been discussing new rules of origin for other
industries, including electronics. Mr. Greer said the United States and Mexico were
exploring whether they could reduce the U.S. trade deficit with Mexico, while simultaneously
encouraging a return of manufacturing to North America.
“Are
there ways we can adjust the rules of origin to make it more rewarding to have more
of your electronic supply chain in the United States and Mexico?” he asked.
Mr.
Greer is set to testify before a Senate committee on Wednesday.
Auto
companies have complained that these requirements are too onerous, and will simply
encourage more manufacturing outside of North America. Cars imported from Japan
and South Korea, for example, face only a 15 percent tariff when coming into the
United States under deals struck with the Trump administration.
The
negotiations seem unlikely to conclude soon. Although the United States and Mexico
have been in talks for several months, U.S. negotiations with Canada have not officially
started. Mexico and Canada have been talking on their own, though not carrying out
formal negotiations.
Diego
Marroquín Bitar, a fellow with the Americas program at the Center
for Strategic and International Studies, said the most likely scenario for the North
American trade pact was a “painful extension,” in which negotiations drag on for
many months.
He
said that uncertainty stemming from the USMCA negotiations would likely dampen investment,
including in factories.
“Companies
don’t invest on hope, they invest on predictability,” he said.
Representative
Henry Cuellar, Democrat of Texas whose district includes Laredo, said that U.S.-Mexico
trade had been on the rise, but that tariffs, immigration raids and uncertainty
over the future of USMCA were all holding back local investment.
“Investors
don’t know, ‘Do we invest in this warehouse? Do we do this? Do we not do this?’
And it has a chilling effect,” Mr. Cuellar said.
JD
Gonzalez, a customs broker in Laredo who is contemplating a run for city mayor,
also said that Mr. Trump’s tariffs on some items, like steel, aluminum, copper and tomatoes, had slowed trade locally, leading
to more empty space in local warehouses.
Mr.
Gonzalez was born in Laredo, and he saw trade and the city’s population boom after
NAFTA was signed. In 2000, the World Trade Bridge was opened to relieve pressure
on a border crossing downtown. Now, 18,000 trucks can cross Laredo’s bridges daily.
Locals
refer to the entire region, whether the United States or Mexico, as la frontera, the border. For decades, people went freely back and
forth across the Rio Grande to work, shop, drink and dine.
As
cartel violence picked up in Nuevo Laredo, the city across the border, in the 2000s,
the cities became more divided. But many truck drivers still make multiple trips
a day.
Laredo
is essentially “a big truck stop,” Mr. Gonzalez said. “Everything passes through.”
“USMCA
has been really beneficial for our area,” he said. “We are stronger as a continent
than as individual countries.”