The second day of the WTO ministerial saw two
high-level processes get into gear, with ministers staking out their positions
publicly in the plenaries, while talks on subject areas continued in
facilitator-led groups, with few advances at this stage.
The United States was one of the first speakers at
the plenaries, with US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer
telling
the audience
that while the global trade club “is obviously an important institution” with
various important roles, “serious challenges exist.”
The US official then outlined a series of areas
that the current administration emphasize, issue of transparency and
notifications, the use of the dispute settlement system, the negotiations
themselves, and how to address differing levels of development among countries.
“Too often members seem to believe they can gain
concessions through lawsuits that they could never get at the negotiating
table,” he said.
“We start this year’s ministerial conference with
more questions than answers, and little sense of concrete progress over the
past two years,” said EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmström, also
urging more openness to discussing new issues in the WTO context.
Indian Commerce and Industry Minister Suresh Prabhu also commented on the “new issues” debate, saying that “agreeing
to these would be extremely divisive. Many of these issues are neither trade-related
nor have these been discussed in detail.”
Others also stressed the importance of shoring up
the multilateral system and openness. “Economic globalisation
is an irreversible historical trend,” said Chinese Commerce Minister Zhong Shan. “We believe that no country can succeed in the
world through isolation.”
Separately, ministers from 44 countries issued a joint statement expressing their support for the multilateral
trading system and concerns over the challenges currently facing the WTO.
The statement recalls the WTO’s role in preserving
the integrity of an open, rules-based multilateral trading system. The text
also says members should use the ministerial as an opportunity to modernise the global trade club for today’s trading
landscape.
Negotiating
underway through “Minister Facilitators”
Monday also saw successive meetings convened by
“minister-facilitators” on fisheries, agriculture, services and
non-agricultural market access, e-commerce, and development, followed by
meetings with ministerial conference chair Susana Malcorra
and a heads of delegation meeting in the evening.
Services
Of the facilitator groups, the discussions on Domestic
Regulation (DR) in services are not expected to yield a substantive outcome in
Buenos Aires, with consultations to continue on future work.
S&D for LDCs Only
On development, sources said that today’s talks
also struggled to make headway, with the proposals on special and differential
treatment under discussion remaining controversial, including on whether these
should differentiate among developing countries and whether members should
instead start with a clean slate.
Fisheries
On fisheries, there is much support for continuing
work as outlined in the draft decision forwarded to the ministerial conference.
Officials are still debating how to handle a possible interim article on
disciplining subsidies to illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing,
including how to address special and differential treatment. Another issue is
how to keep momentum going in Geneva in the new year,
potentially to get a final agreement in 2018 or 2019 and thus facilitate
implementation by the UN target date of 2020.
US says No Info on Agri Subsidies – Domestic Support Linked to Market Access
On agriculture, limited progress was reported
across the topics being discussed for possible substantive outcomes, such as
public stockholding for food security purposes or transparency on export
restrictions. Sources say the US had underscored the need for countries to be
more transparent about current policies, a theme that has also emerged
elsewhere, and referred to better notifications on agricultural domestic
support as a precursor to further negotiations.
Washington has tied progress on a permanent
solution on public food stockholding to the talks on agricultural domestic
support, which it had in turn also linked to market access. While some other
countries have linked public stockholding to the domestic support issue, most
countries have long said they do not consider market access to be a probable
outcome from the Buenos Aires ministerial.
Some sources said they believed the US was making
tactical linkages to issues that they knew were unlikely to be resolved during
the conference to avoid making concessions in sensitive areas. Lighthizer is reportedly leaving the event early, though
senior officials from his office will stay on until the end.
Investment Facilitation
Malcorra also reported that some groups have asked for
open-ended sessions on investment facilitation and micro, small, and
medium-sized enterprises, and she confirmed that ministerial co-chairs will
hold those on Tuesday.
E-Commerce in Plurilateral Mode
While another group asked for an open-ended, plurilateral one on e-commerce, she said she would wait to
see how discussions go in the current facilitator group.
US Drags its Feet on
Ministerial Declaration, USTR Leaves BA Early
Looking ahead, Malcorra
is due to convene discussions on Tuesday aiming to find common ground in
drafting the ministerial declaration, a process which was put on hold in Geneva
due to the objections of the US. The conference chair also told members that
the open-ended process on subject-specific areas needed to be able to make some
headway shortly, and has called another heads of delegation meeting during the
early afternoon in Buenos Aires.
Fossil fuel
subsidies reform group issues ministerial statement
Earlier in the day, 12 WTO members endorsed a ministerial
statement on
reforming fossil fuel subsidies, building on a growing political push by the
“Friends of Fossil Fuel Reform” to develop synergies between trade policy tools
and climate action. Backing the declaration are Chile, Costa Rica, Iceland,
Liechtenstein, Mexico, Moldova, New Zealand, Norway, Samoa, Switzerland, the
Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu, and Uruguay.
Investment
facilitation declaration by 60
Separately, various developed and developing
economies announced a ministerial
declaration
on investment facilitation, one day after a high-level breakfast meeting among
supporters. Around 60 WTO members are currently backing the move, counting the
EU and its member states individually.
The coalition called for a “dedicated
minister-level meeting” on the subject in Buenos Aires, and an open-ended
meeting will now occur on Tuesday. They also urged that members approve a
separate “draft ministerial decision on investment facilitation for
development.”
The joint declaration came just one month after a high-level
forum held in
Abuja, Nigeria, which saw participants discuss how investment facilitation
could support development in the African context, their interest in advancing the
subject in the WTO framework, and the importance of scaling up investment flows
to support the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Friends of MSMEs
Declaration of 82
A group of countries known as the “Friends of
MSMEs” tabled a draft ministerial decision to establish a work programme for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises
(MSMEs) in the WTO today.
In addition, a joint ministerial
declaration
supported by 82 countries was circulated among members and called for the
above-mentioned “dedicated minister-level meeting” on MSMEs during the
ministerial conference and for the adoption of the ministerial decision.
The draft decision – if adopted would establish a
work programme for MSMEs, including measures aimed at
making it easier for such enterprises to take part in international trade, such
as through improved information on what is required and more predictable
regulatory environments.
According to sources familiar with the
ministerial-level meeting on the subject, some members encouraged countries
which currently aren’t part of the “friends of MSMEs,” notably the African
Group, to support the initiative. Additionally, several developed and developing
country members emphasised the important role that
these companies play in economies and development.